CirculeID

concept

EUDR Due Diligence: What Is Actually Required

EUDR compliance fails on plot geometry more often than paperwork. What Article 9 requires, when a point is not enough, and how the statement travels on.

CirculeID Research6 min read1,243 words

The EU Deforestation Regulation requires geolocation of every plot of production, a risk assessment, and a due diligence statement lodged before placing goods on the market. Plots above four hectares need a polygon rather than a point, because a single coordinate on a large estate evidences nothing.

What this gives you

What EUDR due diligence requires in practice for each of the seven commodities, the geolocation evidence that satisfies it, and where chains most often break.

Key takeaways

  • The obligation is geometric: coordinates for every plot, with polygons required above four hectares.
  • Deforestation-free is measured against a fixed cut-off of 31 December 2020, regardless of local legality.
  • The due diligence statement reference travels downstream, so your customers need it for their own statement.
  • Seven commodities and their derived products are covered, which pulls in far more product categories than expected.

The EU Deforestation Regulation is unusual among product rules in that it asks for coordinates. Not a policy, not an assurance, not a supplier code of conduct — the latitude and longitude of the land the commodity grew on.

That specificity is why programmes fail on geometry rather than on documentation. Companies with mature responsible sourcing policies routinely discover they cannot produce a plot boundary for material they have been buying for a decade.

What is actually in scope

Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 covers cattle, cocoa, coffee, oil palm, rubber, soya and wood, and crucially the products derived from them. That derived-products clause is what pulls in categories nobody expects.

How EUDR commodities reach products that do not appear to contain them
CommodityObvious productsLess obvious products
WoodTimber, furniture, paperPackaging, viscose textiles, charcoal
RubberTyres, sealsFootwear soles, coated fabrics, adhesives
Oil palmFood oilsCosmetics, detergents, lubricants
SoyaFood and feedAnimal-derived products fed on soya
CattleBeef, hidesLeather goods, gelatine
Cocoa and coffeeConfectionery, drinksFlavourings and derived preparations
How EUDR commodities reach products that do not appear to contain them

The practical consequence is that a footwear brand, a cosmetics manufacturer and a furniture retailer are all in scope, frequently without having considered themselves affected by a deforestation regulation.

The three obligations

Compliance is built on three requirements that must all hold before the goods are placed on the market.

  1. Deforestation-free. The commodity was produced on land not deforested after 31 December 2020. The cut-off is fixed and does not move with local law.
  2. Legally produced. Production complied with the relevant legislation of the country of production, covering land use rights, environmental and labour law, and taxes.
  3. Covered by a due diligence statement. Lodged in the EU information system before placing on the market, and referenced downstream.

Why geometry is where it breaks

Article 9 requires geolocation of all plots of production. For plots above four hectares that means a polygon — the boundary of the land — rather than a single coordinate.

The reasoning is straightforward once stated. A point on a sixty-hectare estate tells you nothing about whether the specific area the crop came from was forest in 2021. Only a boundary allows satellite imagery to be checked against the cut-off.

Collecting polygons from smallholders is the practical difficulty. A cooperative aggregating output from hundreds of farms has historically recorded membership rather than land boundaries, and gathering them requires field work rather than a data request.

How the statement moves downstream

A due diligence statement carries a reference number, and that reference is what downstream operators rely on when making their own statement. This creates a chain that is easy to break.

Each downstream operator relies on the reference from the step before.

The failure mode is a missing reference at any point, which forces the operator below to reconstruct the underlying evidence themselves. In practice that usually means they cannot, and the material becomes unusable for the EU market.

Risk assessment and mitigation

Geolocation alone does not discharge the obligation. An operator must assess the risk that the goods are non-compliant, taking account of the country benchmarking, the complexity of the supply chain, and the reliability of the information collected.

Where risk is not negligible, mitigation is required before the statement can be made — additional information, independent surveys, or audits. The practical difficulty is that mitigation takes time the shipping schedule rarely allows, which is why risk assessment belongs at supplier qualification rather than at the point of import.

Where this meets the product passport

EUDR data and passport data are the same collection exercise approached from different regulations. Both need to know what a product contains, where the material came from, and who asserted it.

A company running them separately builds two supplier engagement programmes against overlapping supplier lists, produces two sets of provenance records, and discovers they disagree. Running them together means the geolocation collected for EUDR becomes the origin attribute the passport needs.

The sequencing advantage is real too. EUDR is in force ahead of most ESPR delegated acts, so a company that builds deep-tier traceability for deforestation compliance has already built the hardest part of its passport programme before the passport deadline arrives.

Frequently asked questions

Which products are covered by EUDR?

Cattle, cocoa, coffee, oil palm, rubber, soya and wood, plus the products derived from them. The derived-products element is what surprises companies: rubber reaches footwear and adhesives, wood reaches viscose textiles and packaging, and oil palm reaches cosmetics, detergents and lubricants.

When is a polygon required instead of a point?

For plots of production above four hectares. Below that a point coordinate is acceptable. The distinction exists because a single coordinate on a large estate cannot evidence whether the specific land the crop grew on was forested at the cut-off date.

What is the deforestation-free cut-off date?

Land must not have been deforested after 31 December 2020. The date is fixed and independent of local law, so land cleared legally under the producing country’s own legislation after that date still fails the test. Legality and deforestation-free are cumulative conditions.

Can we rely on an upstream due diligence statement?

Downstream operators can reference statements already lodged for the same goods, which is what makes the chain workable. The risk is a break: if any step fails to lodge or fails to pass on the reference, the operator below has to reconstruct the underlying plot evidence directly.

How do we collect geolocation from smallholders?

It generally requires field collection rather than a data request, often coordinated through cooperatives or exporters who have the local relationships. Membership records are not a substitute for plot boundaries, which is the gap most aggregated supply chains discover when they begin.

Does EUDR overlap with the Digital Product Passport?

Substantially. Both require knowing what a product contains and where the material originated, with provenance attached. Building deep-tier traceability for EUDR delivers most of the hardest part of a passport programme, and running the two separately produces duplicated effort and conflicting records.

What happens if a supplier cannot provide geolocation?

The material cannot lawfully be placed on the EU market, since the statement cannot be made without it. That is an uncomfortable conclusion and occasionally the correct one, and reaching it early gives time to qualify an alternative source rather than discovering it at the border.

Sources

  1. Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 on deforestation-free productsEUR-Lex, European Union, 2023-06
  2. Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 establishing a framework for ecodesign requirementsEUR-Lex, European Union, 2024-06

Continue reading

Next step

See a passport built on this

CirculeID turns the requirements described above into a working Digital Product Passport for your products.

Index